Discussion:
[c-nsp] Cisco ASR RIB Failure ?
Olivier CALVANO
2018-12-05 06:56:54 UTC
Permalink
Hi

On all of my router, i have :

ASR1002.BLD1#sh ip bgp 172.16.0.1
BGP routing table entry for 172.16.0.1/32, version 1184149
Paths: (2 available, best #1, table default, not advertised to EBGP peer,
RIB-failure(17))


how can I do to find the problem of "RIB-failure(17)"

thanks for your suggestion

Regards
Olivier
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-***@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Lukas Tribus
2018-12-05 08:04:30 UTC
Permalink
Hi,


On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 07:58, Olivier CALVANO <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On all of my router, i have :
>
> ASR1002.BLD1#sh ip bgp 172.16.0.1
> BGP routing table entry for 172.16.0.1/32, version 1184149
> Paths: (2 available, best #1, table default, not advertised to EBGP peer,
> RIB-failure(17))
>
>
> how can I do to find the problem of "RIB-failure(17)"

show ip route 172.16.0.1

You probably have a route with a lower administrative distance, than
EBGP (20), for example a static route.



lukas
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-***@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Bradley Ordner
2018-12-05 09:12:44 UTC
Permalink
You should have the command ‘show ip bgp rib-failure’ which will point you in the right direction.

Brad Ordner


Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Dec 2018, at 6:05 pm, Lukas Tribus <***@ltri.eu> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 07:58, Olivier CALVANO <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On all of my router, i have :
>>
>> ASR1002.BLD1#sh ip bgp 172.16.0.1
>> BGP routing table entry for 172.16.0.1/32, version 1184149
>> Paths: (2 available, best #1, table default, not advertised to EBGP peer,
>> RIB-failure(17))
>>
>>
>> how can I do to find the problem of "RIB-failure(17)"
>
> show ip route 172.16.0.1
>
> You probably have a route with a lower administrative distance, than
> EBGP (20), for example a static route.
>
>
>
> lukas
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-***@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-***@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.ne
Loading...